Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Portfolio Drop Off

How you'll feel after turning in your portfolio

How you'll feel if you don't.



Folks:

Today is the only day to turn in your portfolio. You can either turn it in in class or bring it by during my office hour (8:35-9:35) or, at the very latest, I'll swing by my office at 3:30pm for one last swoop.

Please do not leave your portfolio in my office, next to my office, or anywhere else. Please be sure to personally turn it to me. Not to "that guy" in my office or anyone else you see aimlessly roaming the hallways.  There have been known to be evil, portfolio-snatching gnomes roaming these parts!

Live long and prosper! :-) Oh, and Merry Christmas, too.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Stop! It's (almost) Grammar Time




It's just about that time of the writing process where we begin editing.

One way I recommend going about editing your papers is to take them to the University Writing Center (in the library). They're super apt at finding all your wonderful spelling, punctuation and usage errors, so give them a try!

One other thing we'll be doing in class is having Mini-Lessons on pesky grammar skills that I've noticed (by reading your papers of course) you might be having trouble with. For extra credit, why don't you volunteer to teach the class about one of these? Your lesson will have to include 1. An explanation of the rules and 2. an activity to reinforce it with the class. You should expect to spend between 10-15 minutes. Volunteers who successfully present a "Grammar Time" lesson will receive 5 points to their final grade. It's pretty generous, I know.

Up for grabs:

MWF Classes

Monday December 2nd

1.Then vs. Than
2. Identifying and Correcting Run-On Sentences
3. Properly Using Quotation Marks
4. Their, There, and They're (Oh my!)


Wednesday December 4th

1. Using Semi Colons
2. To, Too, and Two
3. You're vs. Your
4. Apostrophes


I will be taking attendance these days for a grade, so be sure to be in class!

Friday, November 22, 2013

Portfolio Requirements




Folks:

All portfolios are due on Wednesday, December 4th. This will be our last day together ::cue tiny violin music::

Your portfolio is hefty. It's a big piece of your grade (60%!). Be sure to go a good job with it.

Your portfolio must include:

1. Graded copies of stages 1-5 with my comments. If you've misplaced my comments, then instead of including this, you'll need to write a one page reflection on your revision process (what you've changed and why) for each missing paper.

2. Your original Stage VI -- of course, without my comments. This will be your pre-peer review version. 

3. Revised and edited copies of stages 1-6.

4. Your public document for stage V

Please be sure you're turning in polished work. At this point, I will be looking at grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting in addition to content. Many students have asked if MLA formatting is required. The short of my answer is "yes" -- UNLESS you have a reason for not using MLA. For example, if, throughout the semester, your writing has been focused on a science discipline, you may choose to use APA instead. Maybe your essays are all about how MLA ruined your life D-: in which case, it would make sense to use something else.

So in other words, if you don't use MLA, be sure to articulate WHY you've made the rhetorical decision not to.

 How you decide to present this information to me is entirely up to you. As long as it is presented in a way that your audience (me!) can easily make sense of your work, you'll be in good shape. Is turning in a big pile of crumpled/unstabled and messy papers audience centered? I'm thinking no.

You are being graded on the quality of your finished product and the rhetorical effectiveness of your writing.

May the force be with you! Make it so! For Durotar! Engage!

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Stage VI Thoughts

Our last essay of the semester!

Aren't you excited? Yay.

Stage VI is all about thinking back through your journey as a writer in 1301. Of course, look at the writing assignment deets tab for more information, but once you've done that, here are the four things I'll be looking for when evaluating your papers:



1. Narrative -- How does the essay illustrate who the author was as a writer coming in to 1301? Does the narrative address the struggles/difficulties of the course, or lack their of? How did the author overcome their struggles?
2. Vivid Details -- The key to a successful stage VI is all about specifics. How does the author incorporate specific detail into their essay? Do they quote specific readings? Give examples from class discussion? Refer back to their essays?
3. Discourse -- How does the author situate their development as a writer within the greater discourse of writing studies?
4. Significance -- How does the author articulate the significance of their development and journey? What was the outcome of it all, and why is it important? What does it mean for their future as a writer/student/person in the world?

And if that's not enough direction, wouldn't you like to see an example?

Example of an A paper, though, of course, this is only one of a million different ways to earn an A on this assignment.


Friday, November 22nd is our work day. No formal class, but you're welcome to bring a draft by my office for feedback.
 
Your first draft is due on Monday, November 25th. Bring 3 copies to class.

 Revisions will be due in your portfolio.

Friday, November 8, 2013

Presentation Schedule

I love how the teacher has a mustache.

Next week, we will be presenting our Stage V public documents. I am taking attendance on these days for a grade, so be sure to come! And don't be late because it's rude. I will give you a mean look and possibly a kick in the pants (and/or a zero). Below is our schedule:

MWF 7:45

Wednesday November 13th

Eva
Karisma
Karina
Eliana
Art
Sergio
Stephanie

Friday November 15th

Zable
Vanessa
Abigail
Iris
Jonathan
Francine
Guillermo

Monday November 18th

Paolo
Maleny
Mari
Gustavo
Ricardo
Alex
Adrian

 MWF 9:45

Wednesday, November 13th

Victoria
Rachell
Michael
Sarrah
Kaitlynn
Juan
Gareth

Friday, November 15th

Linette
Benjamin
Javi
Julio
Sylvester
Eddie
Tomas

Monday, November 18th

Max
Melissa
Flavio
Alexis
Savannah
Crystal A
Daniel
Edson


MWF 11:45

Wednesday, November 13th

Loretta
Roemello
Alejandra R
Leslie
Alejendra O
Vanessa
Jose
Melissa

Friday, November 15th

Edna
Brittany
Erick
Paolo
Amber
Christian C
Christian A

Monday, November 18th

Karol
Jennifer
Marlyn
Brennen
Alfredo
Nereyda
Bryan

Some of you all were looking for examples of past Stage V projects, so here are a few.

Experienced Readers and Writers Block Youtube Video

Writing Perspectives Blog

A Prezi About College Professors' Expectations

Rhetoric, Yay! Prezi

Rage Comic


For extra credit, offer an analysis and evaluation of one of the projects in the comments section!

Monday, November 4, 2013

Thoughts on Stage V


Be like business cat! Think outside the box.
We've got some mighty hefty workdays ahead of us, kiddos!

While we're "away" from class, feel free to discuss your Stage V projects in the comment box below. Pose questions, get reactions, seek advice. If you provide helpful advice to a peer, as per always, there is extra credit to be earned.

On that note, I know some of you are wondering and weary about the grading procedures for Stage V. There are three elements to your Stage V project










  • Your Public Document (5 points possible)
  • Your Reflective Essay (5 points possible now, 5 additional when turned in with the portfolio at the end of the semester)
  • Your Presentation (5 points possible)

Lemmie break it down for you.

For the "Public Document" you'll be graded on this scale:

Rhetorically Smart (Full five points -- document demonstrates an awareness of audience, purpose, and form. It is also complete and polished)
Rhetorically Aware (Four Points -- document demonstrates an awareness of audience, purpose and form, but is either unfinished/unpolished, or could have been approached in a more effective manner).
Rhetorically Average (Three points -- document is missing one of the crucial elements -- audience, purpose, context!)
Rhetorically Dull (Two Points -- document is missing two elements! and/or is unfinished/sloppy)
Rhetorical Fail (One point -- you know where this is going)


For the Reflective Essay:

This is your chance to prove to me how rhetorically smart your document is. There are a few ways to approach this:

1. A cover letter as a guide to your public document explaining all of it's rhetorical awesomeness
2. An essay that articulates WHY your public document deserves an A
3.  A narrative explaining how you came about the idea for your project, outlining your decisions and why you made them.

But of course, these are only suggestions.

Here are the questions I'll be asking myself while grading. You can think of these as peer review questions if you'd like to get feedback from a partner (or me!):

1. How does the author describe the public document in their essay? There should be enough detail to get an idea of what is being described.

2. How does the author address the document's purpose? In other words, why was the public document created? Does the author give reasons for choosing this purpose?

3. How does the author address the document's audience? The audience should be a specific, targeted group of people. Are there any secondary audiences? How are they addressed? Does the author give reasons for choosing this specific audience?

4. How does the author define rhetorical effectiveness, in relation to their document? How do they justify their choices as a author in terms of genre, form, content, etc?

5. How does the author bring research (inquiry) into their discussion of their document? A works cited page should also be included.

This is the loose rubric I'll be using when grading your reflective document.

And finally, the presentation:

1. Does the presenter effectively use their alotted time?
2. Does the presenter communicate with the audience? (I.e -- voice, body language, tone, etc)
3. Content of the presentation -- does the presenter go in depth in describing their document? How do they explain their rhetorical decisions to the audience?

As I mentioned in class, during the alotted "work days" I'll be in my office, available to look at drafts or bounce ideas off of. The following are our alotted work days and the times I'm available in my office (ARHU 269). My hours are 8am-11:30am

Friday, November 8th
Monday, November 11th

Come visit me. Bring a draft! Or food. :-3

And one last reminder:

Feel free to comment here to get help from your classmates!

ADDED IN: Extra point to the first person to find business cat's typo :-X

Friday, November 1, 2013

Rhetorically Smart?


Are YOU Rhetorically smart?
Before we begin Stage V, I'd like to pause for a moment and reflect on writing. What does it mean to be "rhetorically smart?"

Let's take a look at some video examples. Do you think these are rhetorically smart videos?



Your assignment:
Find an example of a public document with an audience similar to your own and write an analysis of it. How might you use what you learned from this analysis in your own plans for Stage V?
If you need some more direction, feel free to address the following questions:
  • What made you choose this particular document?
  • Who was the intended audience and how could you tell?
  • What was the purpose of the document? How successful do you think the document was in reaching its purpose?
  • What does it get "rhetorically right?"
  •  How does it fail?
  • What can YOU take away from this document when creating your own?
Your analysis should be about one page, typed, double spaced. Please also bring a copy, link, or picture of the public document you've decided to analyze.

Due Friday, November 8th (We won't be having class on Friday, so bring your response by my office between 8am-11:30am. If you'd like to turn it in on Wednesday and not worry about it, that works, too).

In addition, please review the Stage V assignment as we will be discussing it in more detail on Wednesday.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Professor/Student Conferences

Don't stand me up! >:O

This week and next, we'll be having one-to-one conferences during our classtime. All conferences will take place in my office (ARHU 269). Please be on time -- as you can see, I have a very busy schedule is packed and if you're late, I won't be able to see you.

Attendance is for a grade, too.

Regular classes resume on Monday, November 4th. Your revisions to Stage IV will be due then.

MWF 7:45

Wednesday, October 23rd
7:45 -- Eliana
7:55 -- Mari
8:05 -- Stephanie
8:15 -- Karisma
8:25 -- Alexia

Friday, October 25th
7:45 -- Eva
7:55 -- Karina
8:05 -- Jonathan
8:15 -- Francine
8:25 -- Alex



Monday, October 28th
7:45 -- Guillermo
7:55 -- Paolo
8:05 -- Maleny
8:15 -- Jose
8:25 -- Vanessa
8:35 -- AVAILABLE

Wednesday, October 30th
7:45 -- Adrian
7:55-- Gustavo
8:05 -- Ricardo
8:15 -- Abigail
8:25 -- Zable


Friday, November 1st
7:45 -- Mello
7:55 -- Iris
8:05 -- Art
8:15 -- Sergio
8:25 -- Karisma
8:35-- Mario

MWF 9:45

Wednesday, October 23rd
9:45 -- Sylvester
9:55 -- Kaitlynn
10:05 -- Benjamin
10:15 -- Juan
10:25 -- Melissa

Friday, October 25th
9:35 -- AVAILABLE
9:45 -- Victoria
9:55 -- Michael
10:05 -- Rachell
10:15 -- Sarrah
10:25 -- Daniel

Monday, October 28th
9:35 -- Javi
9:45 -- Eddie
9:55 -- Tomas
10:05 -- Flavio
10:15 -- Max
10:25 -- Crystal

Wednesday, October 30th
9:45 -- Linnette
9:55 -- Savannah
10:05 -- Julio
10:15 -- Edson
10:25 -- Sonia
10:35 -- Brittany C

Friday, November 1st

9:45 -- Gareth
9:55 --  Victoria
10:05 -- Edson

MWF 11:45

Wednesday October 23
11:35 -- Stephanie
11:45 -- Alejandra R
11:55 -- Leslie
12:05 -- Erick
12:15 -- Brittany
12:25 -- Amber

Friday October 25
 11:35 -- Jose
11:45 -- Loretta
11:55 --
12:05 -- Jennifer
12:15 -- Bryan
12:25 -- Christian A

Monday October 28
11:35 -- Marlyn
11:45 -- Daniel C
11:55 -- Paola C
12:05 -- Christian C
12:15 -- Alejandra O
12:25 -- Vanessa

Wednesday, Oct 30th
11:45 -- Alfredo
11:55 -- Nereyda
12:05 -- Edna
12:15 -- Karol
12:25 -- Melissa
12:35 -- Amber

Saturday, October 19, 2013

We're Halfway There!

Class,

A few things.

Stage IV

First of all, several of you have been asking questions about Stage IV, how to pull it together, how to format it, etc. Stage IV is an essay about your research -- what are you investigating? why is it important? how are you investigating it? what did you learn from your research? It's all about explaining what conclusion you've come to based on your investigation.

Any of the articles we've read this semester are doing something similar to what you need to do in Stage IV. For example, Flower's research question was likely -- how do experienced and inexperienced readers differ when they interpret a text. She explained how what she was studying connected to other ideas, explained why it was important, and then proceed to describe her research, and finally, her conclusion -- that it all comes down to rhetorical strategies. So using the articles we've read this semester as models is a good approach, though of course, your audience and purpose are unique.

 Here is another example from a former student. This particular example was draft 2 for this student, and she still continued to make revisions afterwards based on my feedback (which you can see!).

 Any other questions or concerns? Feel free to post below.

For Monday

On Monday, we're going to be completing an in-class reflective assignment, almost like a mini-portfolio. In order to do this, you'll need your graded copies of stages 1-3.



Grade Received
Instructor Comments or Suggestions
Revisions Made/Plan to make
What you learned from this assignment
S1




S2




S3






Mid-term Reflective Writing Assignment


Think about the below questions and use them to prepare a response reflecting on the progress you’ve made so far this semester. Please prepare your response on a separate sheet of paper. It should be at least one handwritten page.

     What do you know about yourself as a writer now that you didn’t know before? What strategies have you learned to use to make your writing more effective?
     What were the important questions for you?
     Where do you see glimmers of understanding? What do you still need to work out in your mind? Where do you see yourself not being able to say/do what you wanted to?
     What have you learned about composing, about rhetoric, about revision, about yourself?
     What were the things that helped you learn?
     What were the challenges you faced so far this semester? How did you deal with those challenges?
     What do you still want to know more about?



If you know you're going to be out on Monday, please complete the assignment and return to me during your appointment (which you'll have to email me for after your scheduled class meeting on).

Which brings me to my final topic!

Conferencing Appointments

Weeks 9 and 10 will be dedicated to one-to-one conferencing, which will take place in my office during our regularly scheduled class time. We will be discussing your Stage IV drafts. We will not be having class for these days. Use this time to work on your Stage IV revisions. You will be signing up for your appointment in class on Monday (so again! better be in class).

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Good Research?

Does research make you feel like this? Then you've come to the right place!

For the past two weeks, we've been talking about, conducting, and writing about "research." We've read Kantz. We've visited the librarians. We've even gone out and conducted a bit or research ourselves. Now it's time to reflect on what we've learned!

In your groups, I want you to discuss some tips/strategies/pieces of advice about research that you would give to an entering college freshman. What is it that makes for "good research?" Try to incorporate advice from the Kantz article, but also think beyond that: what have you learned previous to this class about research? In your other classes this semester? From the librarians? From your own practices?

Develop a list and be ready to share it with the class! We'll be adding to this blogpost. Remember, your AUDIENCE is FYC students.

An FYC Guide to Good Research
By: Ms. Hoerth's (adjective to be determined) Students


7:45

  • Wikipedia is not a credible source, but the citations at the bottom MIGHT be! It gives a good background, but shouldn't be used in our actual research
  • Interviews are good sources for opinions
  • Maintain an unbiased perspective when conducting research. Use points of view for comparison
  • Be receptive to information that contradicts your theory (it makes your argument even stronger!)
  • Use all available resources (not just google!). Library databases, books, scholarly articles, and googleSCHOLAR.
  • When writing your research, don't just paraphrase what you get from your resources, but CREATE an argument.
  • Check where and when the source was published. See if it's still relevant or if it's biased.
  • Don't plagiarize (Cite, put things in your own words, and create original arguments about your sources).
  • In your writing, make sure you've answered your theory
  • Keep in contact with your primary sources to make sure they're on task
  • Use primary research wisely. Cite specific details and similarities to answer your question.


9:45

  • Have enough time to ANALYZE your sources (don't procrastinate!)
  • Talk to professors to get additional points of views and feedback
  • Get feedback from your peers, too.
  • Wikipedia is not reliable source, but it is a good starting ground to get background information
  • Don't rewrite what's already been told -- make it your own!
  • Get different points of view to help strengthen your argument
  • Have "good" sources to back up your ideas (one that elaborates and has credible citations) 
  • If you're doing primary research, have a variety of subjects
  • Know your resources -- check to see if it's valid (a good hint is to use the library, online databases, googleSCHOLAR)
  • Cite sources persuasively to convince your audience of your argument
  • Stay on topic in your paper
  • Have a "plan" for what you're researching (and a back-up).
  • Make your research plans a heuristic, not an algorithim. BE OPEN TO CHANGE.

11:45

  • Have an understanding of your topic. Research other people's thoughts, then add your own (dig deeper)
  • Take your time, because rhetorical reading and writing do take time. 
  • Construct a claim by asking questions and using the K. triangle
  • Try obtaining multiple feedbacks (the blog, friends, anyone you trust)
  • Have an actual interest in your research. It will help!
  • Make simple so people can understand (depends on your audience)
  • Use multiple sources with different points of view (if you find a contradictory point, use it!).
  • Sources aren't just articles! Use other media 
  • Make the research paper a conversation. Add to the conversation in your writing (discourse)
  • Origin, purpose, value and limitations for analyzing sources
  • Research should be open to change. Your IDEAS should be changing as you go 
  • Make sure your sources are still relevant
  • Research should be broken down -- look at both pros and cons.



Reflective Writing Assignment (To be completed in class before you leave!):

Based on today's class discussion and the Kantz article, do you think you're conducting "good research?" What do you think you're getting right? What do you think you need to work on? Use specifics from your experiences working with the Stage assignments to support your claim.

If you need a bit more direction, think about the problems Shirley encounters in her research and discuss how you're overcoming (or not) those difficulties.


Reminders for next week:

FRIDAY

Stage IV Work day.
Stage III Revisions are due. Bring them by my office from 8:00-11:30am COAS 269

MONDAY
Stage IV DRAFT 1 due. Bring 1 copy to class
Also, bring copies of Stages 1-3 with my feedback to class for an in-class reflective assignment.
It is very important that you're in class on Monday and come prepared.


Monday, October 14, 2013

Didn't Read LOL?





Didn't do your reading assignment? You know who you are! ::shameful pointing::
If you'd like to replace your quiz grade, you can write a responses to the questions below. Your responses must be a minimum of one page, typed, double-spaced. This will be due on WEDNESDAY in class.


1.Thinking back to Flower, what does it mean to read rhetorically? How does this relate to writing a research paper? 


2.    Read Shirley’s paper and the analysis of it on page 75. Why does Kantz suggest that she got a C-? What’s wrong with her paper? Is it similar to your paper? What might you do to avoid falling into the same trap as Shirley?
3.     When reading sources for a research paper, what is your job? What are you trying to do? Has your research process changed at all over the course of this class? What might you do differently in order to be more successful as a rhetorical writer?
4.    What role does Kantz say audience plays in Shirley’s sources? Why is it so significant? Thinking about your own research so far, do you think audience plays a significant role? Discuss your experiences. 
5.     Describe the triangle Kantz discusses. What are “gaps,” and how might observing these help you in your research? Thinking about your research, have you found any gaps? If so, discuss them. If not, why do you think you haven’t found any?
And while you're at it, here are some gifs just for you!


Sunday, October 13, 2013

Interesting Sources


 So this weekend I've been mulling over y'all's stage IIIs. I notice that some of you have some really awesome sources. Also, I've been poking around my favorite websites and sometimes come across something that I think one of y'all can use. So, let's use this space to post interesting sources to share with one another.

The rules --

Post a link to the source
A brief description of what it's about
A brief explanation as to why you think it's awesome.

The can be research related to your topics, of course, or maybe you've just some across something cool while surfing this weekend.

I'll share a few that I've found:

Can Multitasking Change the Way Kids Learn
This source comes from an educational blog I like to follow, and it basically discusses different environments today's students study in. I think it's interesting because, well, I'm the kind of person who needs peace and quiet, but according to this article, it looks like I'm in the minority. Maybe I'm just getting old. Anyway, MICHAEL, this source might be useful to you.

Butzlaff, Ron. Can Music Be Used to Teach Reading? Journal of Aesthetic Education Vol. 34, No. 3/4, Special Issue: The Arts and Academic Achievement: What the Evidence Shows (Autumn - Winter, 2000), pp. 167-178
 
So for this one, I had to basically give you all the works cited entry, but you should be able to find it in the library database (it's available through JSTOR). I know a lot of you all are researching questions related to music, and this one ties in music to learning to read. It mainly focuses on little kiddos, but still, it might be useful to some of you (AHEM mello AHEM) 
 
 
I love TED talks. This one is pretty short, too, and it talks about the benefits of sleep for your brain. I know several of you are studying sleep and writing soo... there it is. A nonacademic source for you! 
 
Barlar, Nancy Elizabeth. The effect of sight-reading instruction on the language reading fluency and music sight-reading ability of middle school band students. Boston University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing, 2010. 3405960. 

This one I found in the UTPA library databases. You can type in the title and it should pop up. Basically, it talks about how learning an instrument can support a student's ability to read more fluently. I know, useful stuff, right? Woot woot...

 
Frida Marina Fischer, et al. "Sleep Patterns And Sleepiness Of Working College Students." Work 41.(2012): 5550-5552. Business Source Complete. Web. 13 Oct. 2013.

I found this one in the library database, too. It talks about how lack of sleep affects college students' academic abilities, particularly those who work (or have other responsibilities outside of school).  It IS tough, right? I've always worked, before college, while in college, and now after college, because I have this cray-cray idea that I should be independent, and geeeez yeah, I remember being tired ALL. THE. TIME while in college. I know some of you all are researching sleep and others working college students, so maybe this is useful to you. 



Have an interesting source to share? There's some extra credit in it for you, of course.


Friday, October 4, 2013

Stage III Thoughts


 You all already know how reluctant I am to give examples, but yeah, ok, I think in this case, since perhaps many of you have never seen a research proposal before, I'll go ahead and provide one for you. This one I actually created! See, it's not that hard. I did it this afternoon.



Writing Stage 3- Planning Inquiry
English 1301 Writing Project
 Stage 3-Planning Inquiry

Discussion of your chosen construct & (mis)conceptions about that construct:
I’ve always considered myself to be a “good reader,” and after reading Flower’s article “Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of Meaning,” I began to see why. I liked reading because I knew that it meant to immerse yourself into the ideas of someone else, be they fiction or nonfiction. It’s always been pretty easy for me to see reading in this way. Flower thinks that “good readers” are good readers because they have a lot of experience. Maybe they read a lot. Maybe they have interesting and eventful lives which allow them an array of life experiences. I think she’s on to something there, and I’d like to explore one other aspect of rhetorical reading. Can that experience, too, come from playing MMORPGs? 

 Discussion of your research question
My research question, at this point, is “How does playing MMORPGs affect someone’s ability to read rhetorically?”
I’m curious about this question because I think it maybe unlocks a reason as to why I’ve always been able to read rhetorically, even before Flower defined it for me.  And before I go off explaining why, I think it’s important to first define what an MMORPG is. It stands for Massive Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game. The most famous example is probably World of Warcraft. In these games, players enter into an unfamiliar, fictional world and have to essentially make inferences as to how it works. Players create a “toon” or an avatar that gets stronger as you progress through the game. They experience and interact with other players, and yes, they have to actually READ a lot in order to figure out what’s going on. A lot of the more advanced tasks (dungeons and raids) require you to interact with a group to finish a task you wouldn’t otherwise be able to do on your own (like a group project), and I can remember more than once I hadn’t done my reading (or understood it well enough), didn’t know what was going on in the dungeon, and well, got scolded for doing it wrong and making my group “wipe.” Wipe is gamer-speak for fail.
I don’t think this is an entirely useless or trivial question; there’s a lot at stake here. Oftentimes, publics tend to think of these games as wastes of time, and surely, sometimes, they really are. However, I do feel as though there is some value to playing them, and I’m thinking that in immersing yourself in another’s world and imagination is a whole lot like rhetorical reading. I’m going to try and build on that connection, if for no other reason, so I’ll have an excuse to keep playing them J

List of keywords
Looking for articles was actually easier than I’d expected. I guess a lot of other people are also curious about the effects of MMORPGs on learning. I just typed in MMORPG into the library database and got a wealth of information. I also was successful in bringing up more general articles on the benefits of playing video games from one of my favorite education blogs, MindShift.

List of relevant sources (written as correct works cited entries) with brief annotations
Chun-Chia Lee, Shang Hwa Hsu, Jen-Wei Chang, (2013) "Factors influencing sociability in 

           educational 

MMORPGs – a fuzzy AHP approach", Internet Research, Vol. 23 Iss: 3, pp.298 – 315
This article discusses how MMORPGs encourage sociability in students, like cooperation, team-based reward, discussion of strategy, reputation, and social navigation. It basically concludes that MMORPGs help students be more open to socialization with one another, because they’ve already experienced this in a virtual world. It’s not exactly rhetorical reading, but I want to focus on “discussion of strategy” as on effect, and tie that in to how I view rhetorical reading, because I see social interaction and being able to discuss a reading as a relevant piece of that puzzle. 

Haas, Christina, and Linda Flower. “Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of      

             Meaning.”  CCC 

39.2 (1988): 167-83.
Of course – how can I get away without using Flower? This article basically defines rhetorical reading for me as being able to relate and connect a text to experiences and the greater discourse. Good readers make inferences and have a sense of implicit claims rather than just reading a text for what it is. I’m going to use this definition of rhetorical reading as the base of my paper. I’m also pretty much copying Flower’s process, getting students to do think alouds as they read something. As much as I’d love to open up brains, I’ll leave that to the neurologists. 

Suh, S., Kim, S.W. and Kim, N.J. (2010), Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary
English education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26: 370–378. 
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00353.

Ok so this article was actually really neat. I think it’s going to be an important source for me. The gist of this article is that these researchers in Korea used MMORPGs to help elementary aged kids learn English. They found that the kids they used this technique with improved in their reading skills, their writing skills, and their teamwork skills. So this is basically my “booyah” article here; it kind of supports my claim. However, I’m going to have to really analyze how this author defines “good reading” and see if it matches up with Flower’s. Also, this article is all about little kids, and I’m focusing more on college-aged students, so my work is still pretty original. This will be a big help for me, though.

Discussion, if relevant, of any primary research you’d like to do.
For this project, I think primary research is going to be essential, since from what I’ve seen so far, no one has really linked these two ideas just yet. I plan on using a test group comprised of 6 college freshman at UTPA. I’m choosing college freshmen because I want everyone to be relatively similar in reading experience.  Three subjects will be “MMORPG gamers” and 3 will be people who do not play MMORPGs. I will give the test groups a poem to read individually, and I will ask them to reflect on their interpretation of the poem. I decided to go with a poem because I think they require more rhetorical reading than prose, as they tend to be a little abstract.
I will then look at the interpretations and see which subjects used rhetorical strategies and which did not. I will be looking for words like “purpose,” “audience,” and “theme” for evidence of rhetorical thinking in the analyses.

Discussion of potential audiences
My audience is really going to depend on my findings. If I find out that playing these types of games supports rhetorical reading strategies, then I’d like to share these findings with college freshmen who tend to struggle with rhetorical reading, or maybe even those who TEACH rhetorical reading (people like myself!).
If my findings are that there’s no real difference, then I’d like to share that data with other MMORPG gamers to let them know that hey, it doesn’t hurt, but it doesn’t really help that much either, so to proceed with moderation. The same goes for if I find that it actually hurts people’s abilities, which is of course a possibility. 

Discussion of potential purposes
Again, this is going to depend on my findings. If I find that there is a positive effect on students’ rhetorical reading abilities, then I’ll use my research to ENCOURAGE struggling students to maybe try this as a strategy to improve their rhetorical reading skills. If my findings are less than encouraging, then I think my purpose would be to warn MMORPG players that their time may be better spent elsewhere.
For me, the real purpose is kind of personal, too. I’m genuinely curious about these findings, and hope to justify one of my seemingly useless hobbies as being at least in part beneficial to me as a reader and thinker. 

Discussion of potential forms/genres
I think it would be interesting and fun to meet MMORPG players where you can find them. I often find myself perusing blogs about these games in order to find strategies, so one way to reach these players would be to create an article/blogpost to put on one of those venues. I would try to avoid using overly technical words, to keep it interesting and maybe even a little entertaining for the readers. Another idea would be like a tutorial youtube style video, as a lot of times I find myself looking up those for instructions on how to do something in the game. I might decide to create one of those for MMORPG players with some interesting title like “How to be a Kingslayer in College”  or “How to Totally PWN College English”


Maybe you could leave ME some feedback? :D I was also thinking about doing a research question that looks into nanowrimo (does anyone else do that? that's another crazy hobby of mine).

A few reminders:

On MONDAY, we won't have formal class. However, you're welcome to bring a rough draft of your Stage III assignment by my office for some feedback. I'm in ARHU 269A and I'll be there from 7:45am to 11:30pm.

Your other option is to do the "book a librarian" if you're having trouble finding sources.

On WEDNESDAY we will have a quiz over Sommers

On FRIDAY your Stage III drafts are due to me. You'll only need to bring one copy.